p.s. What are the pictures, that you attached, supposed to mean?

"Graham Cooper" wrote in message
...

On Dec 23, 1:35 pm, "Don Kelly" wrote:
"James Redford" wrote in message

...

Below is an article that I recently wrote. It concerns the Omega Point
cosmology by physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler, which
is a proof of God's existence based upon the most reserved view of the
known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General
Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). If one has ever wondered about
such questions as what the meaning of life is, what the purpose of
one's own life is, whether there is life after death, whether God
exists, what the future holds for humanity, and why anything exists at
all as opposed to nothingness, then this article answers all of those
questions. This article further provides an examination of the
globalist political power-elite: history is given on their
organizational structure and their methods of accumulating power; and
analysis is given on where they're attempting to take the world, i.e.,
their self-termed New World Order world government and world religion.

--dk response--------------
While I sympathise with what you are trying to say- there is one big point
that that is a problem.
That problem is that you cannot and never will "prove" or "disprove" the
existence of God. You take the total evidence and, if fair, consider that
the hypothesis of the existence of God has as much or more evidence in its
favour than other hypotheses.
What you are referring to is not a proof but evidence pointing to the
possibility. This evidence is stronger than that supporting many
alternatives that have been proposed as hypotheses.
Hans Kung, in "The Beginning of All Things" examines both sides of the
argument- essentially a religious man recognizing and appreciating the
value
of science (Shades of St. Augustine who, in about AD 400, dealt with this.
.
Is there a conflict between "science" and "religion"? Not really.

Don Kelly
cross out to reply


That's why God sent his son to be spat on by 1 million usenet
atheists!

God
----------------dk said------------------------

Only 1 million??? And how many do not spit?

Isn't atheism a form of theism- It is "faith based"
"i believe that there is no God" vs "I believe that God exists" ?
Agnosticism is more honest- It is often more honest than religion.
However, religion, as practiced, and the actual existence of God are often
quite distinct.

Arguments so far appear to be in favour of the" I believe" side but either
way "proof" is beyond us. We can come up with alternate universes, complex
time, etc (no evidence supporting these hypotheses) but, even if true,
there is the problem of how and why there is anything at all-we don't
now -so. like Pascal, place your bets.
I note that the more we learn about what is going on, both going back to the
past, or going ahead. leaves us with an increasing excitement and wonder but
also (in each step) with more questions to be answered.

Augustine in about 400 AD said that if there is a conflict between the
"science" of the bible and what is observed- go with what is observed.
Augustine, in spite of his view of women, is considered a "Saint".


Don Kelly
cross out to reply
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...732290 _n.jpg

Marylin
http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...15113 7_n.jpg

Dog
http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...643838 _n.jpg

Oracle
http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...455778_ n.jpg

Herc