On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:09:29 -0800 (PST), Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Jan 5, 11:00 pm, George Hammond wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:

If (r = r + K) and (K != 0), the (r = 0).

I said "SUBSTITUTE" r+K for r, Tricycle.

No, you can say “SUBSTITUTE” (r + K) for R. shrug

In that case, the two said geometries of spacetime a

** ds1^2 = c^2 (1 – K / r) dt^2 – dr^2 / (1 – K / r) – r^2 dO^2

** ds2^2 = c^2 (1 – K / R) dt^2 – dR^2 / (1 – K / R) – R^2 dO^2

In that case, they are still very different where (R = r + K).

[Hammond]
The COORDINATES are different, but the METRIC is the same.
The metric is the Schwarzchild metric in BOTH cases.
You don't know the difference.

snip crackpot syrup
=====================================
HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3)
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=====================================