![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now, even better than light pollution!??!
https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 11:33:41 PM UTC-7, Chris.B wrote:
Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Ah, you mentioned it first. But your link is paywalled. John Savard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25/01/2018 07:03, Quadibloc wrote:
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 11:33:41 PM UTC-7, Chris.B wrote: Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Ah, you mentioned it first. But your link is paywalled. Odd.. it isn't paywalled from outside the USA. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.d5aac627e8c5 Direct link to the picture of it: https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/im...EeiGuYkIdDx53Q The actual project link: http://www.thehumanitystar.com/ I reckon he would be better off launching a silver plated weather balloons into orbit to achieve the same objective with less mass. My instinct is that it won't be as bright as he hopes. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 09:33:48 UTC+1, Martin Brown wrote:
On 25/01/2018 07:03, Quadibloc wrote: On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 11:33:41 PM UTC-7, Chris.B wrote: Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Ah, you mentioned it first. But your link is paywalled. Odd.. it isn't paywalled from outside the USA. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.d5aac627e8c5 Direct link to the picture of it: https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/im...EeiGuYkIdDx53Q The actual project link: http://www.thehumanitystar.com/ I reckon he would be better off launching a silver plated weather balloons into orbit to achieve the same objective with less mass. My instinct is that it won't be as bright as he hopes. -- Regards, Martin Brown Not paywalled here in Dk. I believe a smooth sphere would have very poor reflective qualities compared with flat, polished facets. The reflected, virtual image of the Sun in a smoothly convex surface is very small with little intensity. While even bare glass from [say] a greenhouse roof can be blinding from miles away. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:33:45 +0000, Martin Brown
wrote: My instinct is that it won't be as bright as he hopes. Iridium flares are caused by the reflection of sunlight off an approximately 2 square meter polished metal surface. Here we have a much smaller surface, but probably a bit more reflective. Seems to me that its flares will be less than the brightest ones seen from Iridium satellites, but maybe more eye catching because of their rapid variation. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 01:33:41 UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Guy is a moron. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:06:05 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote:
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 01:33:41 UTC-5, Chris.B wrote: Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Guy is a moron. IMO, the whole idea is a waste. Oh look! A pretty shiney! What a compelling lesson it offers... teaching/reminding people about the fragile nature of our World - NOT! -- Email address is a Spam trap. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 25 January 2018 20:46:26 UTC+1, Bill wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:06:05 -0800 (PST), RichA wrote: On Thursday, 25 January 2018 01:33:41 UTC-5, Chris.B wrote: Now, even better than light pollution!??! https://preview.tinyurl.com/ydae2tul Aren't disco mirror balls so yesterday? ;-) Guy is a moron. IMO, the whole idea is a waste. Oh look! A pretty shiney! What a compelling lesson it offers... teaching/reminding people about the fragile nature of our World - NOT! -- Not sure about that. What if it gets people to look up for a few moments from their mobile phones? They might ask themselves why the night sky is orange and appears to be falling. It certainly wasn't that low or even that colour when they were kids. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FROM UNIVERSAL TIME TO LOCAL TIME AND BACK | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 20th 12 06:04 PM |
back in time | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | October 20th 06 08:48 PM |
Back in time? | Claude | Misc | 4 | August 30th 06 10:25 AM |
Apollo 9 question (was: Will we ever get this group back on topic?) | OM | History | 1 | May 14th 04 11:49 AM |
USGS & earthquakes -- back on topic on Mars! | Thad Floryan | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | February 8th 04 06:13 AM |