A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 25th 05, 11:28 AM
nightbat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed

nightbat wrote

p6 wrote:

Einstein explored this puzzle for 10 years starting in
1895. He asked what would happen if you look at yourself at
a mirror inside a ship travelling at the speed of light.
Can you see your own reflection at the mirror. If you can,
light can travel faster than the believed speed of
light. But if this is so, you should be able to catch up
with the image beam of your face as it travels to the
mirror. Either way. You can't see the image of your face
at the mirror.

Einstein consulted the idea of Mach and it inspired
him to reject the Aether once and for all especially
after the null results of the MMX. He knew from
Maxwell's equations that light speed can't vary. So
applying it with the Galileo's principle of relativity.
He declared unto the world that everyone should observe
the same velocity of light in whatever location. So
he should see the image of his face after all when
travelling inside a ship at speed of light. But certain
conventional ideas about time, lengths, mass, velocity
had to be chucked out and replaced. So is born the Special
Theory of Relativity that has caused endless debates
even after a hundred years.

Is Einstein thinking flawed when he cooked up his
SR? Note he used the example of looking at mirror
at speed of light when nothing with mass can move
at the speed of light.

For those who believe in Aether. Do you believe that
you can see your image at the mirror when travelling
at the speed of light?? If there is Aether, how come
you can't go faster than the speed of light??

p6


nightbat

You would be able to see your mirror reflection traveling at c
and there is no proven physical based classical understood aether.
Einstein's c limit in normal uniform static zero detectable gravity
field space vacuum is correct but that doesn't mean if the space vacuum
medium itself were in strong gravity field that fixed c frame is vacuum
maintained should space medium itself be traveling inversely to the
fixed speed of light.

ponder on,
the nightbat
  #2  
Old June 26th 05, 02:35 PM
G=EMC^2 Glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi nightbat I see lots of paradoxes "if" a human in his spaceship could
reach light speed. It can't ever be reality to reach that speed, gravity
sees to it. EM energy creates this speed for photons only. Photons don't
get old.Photons never go faster or slower. If photons act like particles
the reason is their great force when both the photon,and its traveling
twin the virtual photon are close together. I call this their gamma
state. When they are far apart they almost completely lose their
force particle feature(effect),and no matter how intense their source
this does not make any difference. Einstien got his Nobel because he
partly knew this to be reality. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A brief list of things that show pseudoscience Vierlingj Astronomy Misc 1 May 14th 04 09:38 PM
O'keefe says Zubrin's op-ed = 'wrong headed thinking...' Tom Merkle Policy 120 October 1st 03 08:15 PM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Mark McIntyre Astronomy Misc 1 August 16th 03 03:08 AM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Jay Windley UK Astronomy 0 August 16th 03 03:08 AM
"The Eagle has landed" NOT! Jay Windley Misc 0 August 16th 03 03:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.