![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat Flannery wrote:
No, all the manned and unmanned Gemini missions were launched by the Titan II ICBM, with the unmanned test of the Blue Gemini prototype spacecraft* with its heatshield hatch that was done as part of the MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) development tests; it was launched by a Titan IIIC. * This was a rebuilt version of Gemini 2 capsule which had flown a unmanned suborbital flight on January 19, 1965. Two flights on the same capsule? Was that a first? Also do you have photos or links to photos of the Blue Gemini Titan IIIC launch? Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/13/2011 10:41 AM, David Spain wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote: No, all the manned and unmanned Gemini missions were launched by the Titan II ICBM, with the unmanned test of the Blue Gemini prototype spacecraft* with its heatshield hatch that was done as part of the MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) development tests; it was launched by a Titan IIIC. * This was a rebuilt version of Gemini 2 capsule which had flown a unmanned suborbital flight on January 19, 1965. Two flights on the same capsule? Was that a first? AFAIK it was. Also do you have photos or links to photos of the Blue Gemini Titan IIIC launch? Yeah, it has a mock-up MOL under the capsule also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ti...i-B-Test_3.jpg The black and white stripes on the MOL mock-up were to allow the resolution of ground-based space tracking cameras to be checked. Here's some photos of the Gemini B* heatshield hatch that would allow access to the MOL crew area from the Gemini via a pressurized tunnel: http://www.ninfinger.org/models/vaul...s/MOLhatch.JPG http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ge...de_Hatch_1.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ge...de_Hatch_2.jpg Here's the heatshield of the Gemini used for the test on display: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/...cc3e3dcc02.jpg Note how far the ablation pattern on the heatshield is off-center due to the lifting reentry profile. The really strange Gemini is this thing: http://www.astronautix.com/craft/winemini.htm Which would have allowed the capsule to maneuver during reentry to get cross-range before deploying its chute or parasail for landing. *I confused Gemini B with Blue Gemini, which was a separate type spacecraft. Pat |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 7:14*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 8/13/2011 10:41 AM, David Spain wrote: Pat Flannery wrote: * No, all the manned and unmanned Gemini missions were launched by the * Titan II ICBM, with the unmanned test of the Blue Gemini prototype * spacecraft* with its heatshield hatch that was done as part of the MOL * (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) development tests; it was launched by a * Titan IIIC. * * This was a rebuilt version of Gemini 2 capsule which had flown a * unmanned suborbital flight on January 19, 1965. Two flights on the same capsule? Was that a first? AFAIK it was. Also do you have photos or links to photos of the Blue Gemini Titan IIIC launch? Yeah, it has a mock-up MOL under the capsule also:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ti...i-B-Test_3.jpg The black and white stripes on the MOL mock-up were to allow the resolution of ground-based space tracking cameras to be checked. Here's *some photos of the Gemini B* heatshield hatch that would allow access to the MOL crew area from the Gemini via a pressurized tunnel:http://www.ninfinger.org/models/vaul...de_Hatch_2.jpg Here's the heatshield of the Gemini used for the test on display:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/...cc3e3dcc02.jpg Note how far the ablation pattern on the heatshield is off-center due to the lifting reentry profile. The really strange Gemini is this thing:http://www.astronautix.com/craft/winemini.htm Which would have allowed the capsule to maneuver during reentry to get cross-range before deploying its chute or parasail for landing. *I confused Gemini B with Blue Gemini, which was a separate type spacecraft. Pat the 2 flight capsule was on display at museumn adjacent to KSC last time i was there |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In David Spain writes:
Pat Flannery wrote: No, all the manned and unmanned Gemini missions were launched by the Titan II ICBM, with the unmanned test of the Blue Gemini prototype spacecraft* with its heatshield hatch that was done as part of the MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory) development tests; it was launched by a Titan IIIC. * This was a rebuilt version of Gemini 2 capsule which had flown a unmanned suborbital flight on January 19, 1965. Two flights on the same capsule? Was that a first? How high does a flight have to be? Mercury spacecraft #2 flew on MR-1 and MR-1A, but MR-1 only reached an altitude of about four inches, which certainly qualifies as 'suborbital' but not so much as 'flight', at least to me. I want a spaceflight to get higher than I can jump up from a standing start. -- Joseph Nebus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Did anyone notice that in this image
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ge...de_Hatch_1.jpg at the top of the seat it has "THIS FACE AFT" but it is facing (to my mind) forward? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/16/2011 10:44 PM, Obviousman wrote:
Did anyone notice that in this image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ge...de_Hatch_1.jpg at the top of the seat it has "THIS FACE AFT" but it is facing (to my mind) forward? Yeah, that is strange, isn't it? It's atop the headrest of the starboard ejection seat. Pat |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/17/2011 9:54 AM, Pat Flannery wrote:
Yeah, that is strange, isn't it? It's atop the headrest of the starboard ejection seat. Is it some sort of attachment for hoisting the seats out of the spacecraft? Pat |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At first I didn't think so; I thought it was where the drogue chute for
the seat would be attached to. Looking at images with the seat fitted in the spacecraft, though, there is nothing attached to that point so I thought you are right. http://www.space1.com/About_Us/In_th...12_seat600.jpg http://www.space1.com/Museum_Exhibit...V_hatchway.jpg I then found the diagramme in the handbook from the NTRS: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1967019706.pdf See figure 3 on page 42 (page 50 in the PDF document). It says it is the rocket catapult attachment point. Is it some sort of attachment for hoisting the seats out of the spacecraft? Pat |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/17/2011 11:01 PM, Obviousman wrote:
I then found the diagramme in the handbook from the NTRS: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/ca...1967019706.pdf See figure 3 on page 42 (page 50 in the PDF document). It says it is the rocket catapult attachment point. I found the same drawing, but with no reference to what it was for: http://www.space1.com/Spacecraft_Dat...tion_seat.html In this article on the seats, the third photo link shows the seats being readied for a abort test, and there is something hooked up to the trunnions: http://www.ejectionsite.com/gemini.htm http://www.ejectionsite.com/ejctpic/gemini_test.jpg Pat |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
blue red blue 14321 12 fifth,6,7,8 dimension | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 3rd 08 05:04 PM |
acomplia weight loss france cpmpany sanofi aventis blue horny pilllilly blue and yellow pill | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 27th 08 09:35 AM |
How did they get the Gemini-Rogallo test vehicle airborne? [ Big G Gemini Question] | John Charles | History | 14 | December 6th 04 02:38 AM |
Gemini-3 Crew did simulated countdown in Gemini-2 | Rusty B | History | 5 | November 23rd 03 07:59 PM |