If the Universe Was Created in 6000 Years, How Come the Moon IsOver 4 Billion Years Old?

On Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:30:04 PM UTC-8, Kenyan Imposter wrote:
On 07 Feb 2014, wy posted some

:


It takes time for a moon to form and develop a pock-marked landscape
of craters, certainly a lot longer than 6000 years.


Wrong. A couple minutes is all it would take if something blew up near

by.


http://www.geekosystem.com/moon-evolution-video/

Who says the moon is 4 billion years old? That's a crock of ****. Nobody
knows how old the moon is.

The physically dark and extremely tough paramagnetic basalt and perhaps somewhat carbonado crust of 3.5 g/cm3 could be fairly recent. However, craters within craters would suggest that it is at least a couple hundred million years old, but there's still no telling as to where it came from.

On Monday, February 10, 2014 8:59:43 AM UTC-8, Brad Guth wrote:
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:30:04 PM UTC-8, Kenyan Imposter wrote:

On 07 Feb 2014, wy posted some



:





It takes time for a moon to form and develop a pock-marked landscape

of craters, certainly a lot longer than 6000 years.





Wrong. A couple minutes is all it would take if something blew up near



by.





http://www.geekosystem.com/moon-evolution-video/



Who says the moon is 4 billion years old? That's a crock of ****. Nobody

knows how old the moon is.



The physically dark and extremely tough paramagnetic basalt and perhaps somewhat carbonado crust of 3.5 g/cm3 could be fairly recent. However, craters within craters would suggest that it is at least a couple hundred million years old, but there's still no telling as to where it came from.

Those recent pictures as supposedly scientifically obtained via the China moon mission with its Yutu rover, would suggest that the bedrock or solidified lava bed areas of our moon is that of a monochromatic light gray, and not the least bit basalt or that of any heavy element composition, and otherwise hardly the least bit ionized, dusty or as having accumulated all that much lose material.

On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:59:43 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:30:04 PM UTC-8, Kenyan Imposter wrote:

On 07 Feb 2014, wy posted some



:





It takes time for a moon to form and develop a pock-marked landscape

of craters, certainly a lot longer than 6000 years.





Wrong. A couple minutes is all it would take if something blew up near



by.





http://www.geekosystem.com/moon-evolution-video/



Who says the moon is 4 billion years old? That's a crock of ****. Nobody

knows how old the moon is.



The physically dark and extremely tough paramagnetic basalt and perhaps somewhat carbonado crust of 3.5 g/cm3 could be fairly recent. However, craters within craters would suggest that it is at least a couple hundred million years old, but there's still no telling as to where it came from.

The moon is no older than about 6000 years. All of mankind's supposed memory doesn't require an evolution beyond about 100K years, and is simply accepting something other than what his recorded history is supposed to be, i.e. if a tree that fell in the woods DID make a noise, then the act of reconstructing the past for the sake of an unfaithful listener is the same as one who tools for answers among some useful idiots of archaeology.

Of course, where the study of extraterrestrial geology becomes important, there's pretty much a long way to go, and a short time to get there, without the much needed actual presence of scientific instrumentation becoming available.

On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:39:54 PM UTC-8, wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:59:43 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:

On Saturday, February 8, 2014 1:30:04 PM UTC-8, Kenyan Imposter wrote:



On 07 Feb 2014, wy posted some







:











It takes time for a moon to form and develop a pock-marked landscape



of craters, certainly a lot longer than 6000 years.











Wrong. A couple minutes is all it would take if something blew up near







by.











http://www.geekosystem.com/moon-evolution-video/







Who says the moon is 4 billion years old? That's a crock of ****. Nobody



knows how old the moon is.







The physically dark and extremely tough paramagnetic basalt and perhaps somewhat carbonado crust of 3.5 g/cm3 could be fairly recent. However, craters within craters would suggest that it is at least a couple hundred million years old, but there's still no telling as to where it came from.



The moon is no older than about 6000 years. All of mankind's supposed memory doesn't require an evolution beyond about 100K years, and is simply accepting something other than what his recorded history is supposed to be, i.e. if a tree that fell in the woods DID make a noise, then the act of reconstructing the past for the sake of an unfaithful listener is the same as one who tools for answers among some useful idiots of archaeology.



Of course, where the study of extraterrestrial geology becomes important, there's pretty much a long way to go, and a short time to get there, without the much needed actual presence of scientific instrumentation becoming available.

As of prior to 12 thousand some odd years ago, there's no mention or depiction of any moon or of anything the least bit associated with our planet as having a moon, seasonal issues or animal migration related. Even though sufficient artistic capabilities had existed for having recorded such a spectacular nighttime item, there's simply no objective evidence of such.