![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a technical question for the group. Does the projected location of the
CAM (zenith, node 2) minimize the amount of momentum imparted to the station by the centrifuge compared to either a port or starboard placement, and would any difference be significant? Also, how important is its position relative to the Z1 truss CMGs in this determination? Thanks much everybody. Pepe LP |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PLP56" kirjoitti viestissä ... I have a technical question for the group. Does the projected location of the CAM (zenith, node 2) minimize the amount of momentum imparted to the station by the centrifuge compared to either a port or starboard placement, and would any difference be significant? Also, how important is its position relative to the Z1 truss CMGs in this determination? Thanks much everybody. Pepe LP I can't answer your question right now, but FYI: The centrifuge module has been cancelled a long time ago. -- MT |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, it has not been cancelled. Just delayed.
"Mika Takala" wrote in message .. . "PLP56" kirjoitti viestissä ... I have a technical question for the group. Does the projected location of the CAM (zenith, node 2) minimize the amount of momentum imparted to the station by the centrifuge compared to either a port or starboard placement, and would any difference be significant? Also, how important is its position relative to the Z1 truss CMGs in this determination? Thanks much everybody. Pepe LP I can't answer your question right now, but FYI: The centrifuge module has been cancelled a long time ago. -- MT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
response to sci.space.moderated skeptics | [email protected] | Space Science Misc | 7 | July 29th 04 06:57 PM |
Discovery's Forward Reaction Control System lowered into position | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | June 30th 04 10:25 PM |